Animal Face Cookies product photo
Non-Irradiated

Animal Face Cookies — Papers™

Animal Face Cookies · UK listing data from MedBud · Batch-tracked by the community

THC 28% · CBD <1%

Photo via medbud.wiki

DistributorDistributor / supplier
Papers™

Name on UK pharmacy menus and prescription labels.

Grown byCultivator
Not listed

We don't have a confirmed cultivator for this listing yet.

Batch History & Patch Updates

Community-tracked quality changes across every medicine drop

14 batches tracked
  1. Batch: 2025-11-5

    Review posted November 2025

    Review posted — November 2025

    3 community reviews

    Latest Drop

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness. Sensory notes include a noticeable cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain, calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  2. Batch: 2025-11-4

    Review posted November 2025

    Review posted — November 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness. Sensory notes include a noticeable cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, effective for chronic pain, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  3. Batch: 2026-02-9

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  4. Batch: 2026-02-8

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  5. Batch: 2026-02-7

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  6. Batch: 2026-02-6

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  7. Batch: 2026-02-5

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  8. Batch: 2026-02-4

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  9. Batch: 2026-02-3

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  10. Batch: 2025-11-3

    Review posted November 2025

    Review posted — November 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness. Sensory notes include a noticeable cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, effective for chronic pain, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  11. Batch: 2025-11-2

    Review posted November 2025

    Review posted — November 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness. Sensory notes include a noticeable cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, effective for chronic pain, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  12. Batch: 2026-02-2

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  13. Batch: 2025-11

    Review posted November 2025

    Review posted — November 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness. Sensory notes include a noticeable cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, effective for chronic pain, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  14. Batch: 2026-02

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    1 community review

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced skunk/sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?

About this strain

Animal Face Cookies is a community-tracked medical cannabis cultivar distributed in the UK by Papers™. Patients report it is commonly used for various conditions. All reviews on CanVerify are tied to specific batch numbers so you can see how quality varies between harvests.

Community reviews reflect individual patient experiences, not clinical trials. Effects vary by person, batch, and condition. Do not start, stop, or change treatment based on this site alone.