Batch: 2025-03-6
Review posted March 2025
Review posted — March 2025
12 community reviews
Rating: 6.5/10
Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, harsh smoke or vapor, potent effects, and milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced lemon/earthy/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain. Issues flagged in discussion include Quality disappointment.
Positives
- Quality improvement
- Strong terpene profile
- Effective for symptoms
- Smooth smoke/vapor
Issues
- Quality disappointment
Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.
