Cookies & Chem product photo
Beta

Cookies & Chem — Tofino Ripper™

Cookies & Chem · UK listing data from MedBud · Batch-tracked by the community

THC 28% · CBD <1%

Photo via medbud.wiki

DistributorDistributor / supplier
Tofino Ripper™

Name on UK pharmacy menus and prescription labels.

Grown byCultivator
Canadian Craft Cannabis Co.

Licensed grower behind this SKU — from MedBud import data or published sources where available.

Batch History & Patch Updates

Community-tracked quality changes across every medicine drop

32 batches tracked
  1. Batch: 2025-06-7

    Review posted June 2025

    Review posted — June 2025

    3 community reviews

    Latest Drop

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  2. Batch: 2026-02-7

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is strongly positive, with several members saying they would buy again. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  3. Batch: 2025-05-6

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    9 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, harsh smoke or vapor, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced lemon/berry/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Smooth smoke/vapor
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  4. Batch: 2025-06-6

    Review posted June 2025

    Review posted — June 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  5. Batch: 2026-01-12

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    8 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  6. Batch: 2026-01-11

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  7. Batch: 2026-02-6

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is strongly positive, with several members saying they would buy again. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  8. Batch: 2025-05-5

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    9 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, harsh smoke or vapor, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced lemon/berry/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Smooth smoke/vapor
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  9. Batch: 2025-06-5

    Review posted June 2025

    Review posted — June 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  10. Batch: 2026-01-10

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    8 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  11. Batch: 2026-01-9

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  12. Batch: 2026-02-5

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is strongly positive, with several members saying they would buy again. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  13. Batch: 2025-05-4

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    9 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, harsh smoke or vapor, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced lemon/berry/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Smooth smoke/vapor
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  14. Batch: 2025-06-4

    Review posted June 2025

    Review posted — June 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  15. Batch: 2026-01-8

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    8 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  16. Batch: 2026-01-7

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  17. Batch: 2026-02-4

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is strongly positive, with several members saying they would buy again. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  18. Batch: 2025-05-3

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    9 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, harsh smoke or vapor, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced lemon/berry/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Smooth smoke/vapor
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  19. Batch: 2025-06-3

    Review posted June 2025

    Review posted — June 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  20. Batch: 2026-01-6

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    8 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  21. Batch: 2026-01-5

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  22. Batch: 2026-02-3

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is strongly positive, with several members saying they would buy again. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  23. Batch: 2025-05-2

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    9 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, harsh smoke or vapor, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced lemon/berry/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Smooth smoke/vapor
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  24. Batch: 2025-06-2

    Review posted June 2025

    Review posted — June 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  25. Batch: 2026-01-4

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    8 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  26. Batch: 2026-01-3

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  27. Batch: 2026-02-2

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is strongly positive, with several members saying they would buy again. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  28. Batch: 2025-05

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    9 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, harsh smoke or vapor, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced lemon/berry/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Smooth smoke/vapor
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  29. Batch: 2025-06

    Review posted June 2025

    Review posted — June 2025

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  30. Batch: 2026-01-2

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    8 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  31. Batch: 2026-01

    Review posted January 2026

    Review posted — January 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  32. Batch: 2026-02

    Review posted February 2026

    Review posted — February 2026

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is strongly positive, with several members saying they would buy again. On physical quality, reviewers mention smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced sweet/cookie aroma and similar character on the palate.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?

About this strain

Cookies & Chem is a community-tracked medical cannabis cultivar distributed in the UK by Tofino Ripper™ (grown by Canadian Craft Cannabis Co.). Patients report it is commonly used for various conditions. All reviews on CanVerify are tied to specific batch numbers so you can see how quality varies between harvests.

Community reviews reflect individual patient experiences, not clinical trials. Effects vary by person, batch, and condition. Do not start, stop, or change treatment based on this site alone.