Glitter Bomb product photo
£7.50/gNon-Irradiated

Glitter Bomb — Glass Pharms

Glitter Bomb · UK listing data from MedBud · Batch-tracked by the community

THC 21% · CBD <1%

Photo via medbud.wiki

DistributorDistributor / supplier
Glass Pharms

Name on UK pharmacy menus and prescription labels.

Grown byCultivator
Not listed

We don't have a confirmed cultivator for this listing yet.

IP / parent: Glass Pharms Ltd

Batch History & Patch Updates

Community-tracked quality changes across every medicine drop

12 batches tracked
  1. Batch: 2026-06-8

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Latest Drop

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  2. Batch: 2026-06-7

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  3. Batch: 2026-06-6

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  4. Batch: 2024-06

    Review posted June 2024

    Review posted — June 2024

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.5/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Community members also noted: Glitter Bomb Review I received today my first batch of Glitter Bomb!

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  5. Batch: 2026-06-5

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  6. Batch: 2026-06-4

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  7. Batch: 2026-06-3

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  8. Batch: 2024-05-3

    Review posted May 2024

    Review posted — May 2024

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 9.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention potent effects. Sensory notes include a noticeable grape aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  9. Batch: 2026-06-2

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  10. Batch: 2024-05-2

    Review posted May 2024

    Review posted — May 2024

    6 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, and potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Strong overall impression

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  11. Batch: 2024-05

    Review posted May 2024

    Review posted — May 2024

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 9.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. Sensory notes include a noticeable berry aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain, and calming effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  12. Batch: 2026-06

    Review posted June 2026

    Review posted — June 2026

    10 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 6.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, and resinous flower structure. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/earthy/floral aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report strong sedative effects, and calming effects. Issues flagged in discussion include Dryness issues.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms

    Issues

    • Dryness issues

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?

About this strain

Glitter Bomb is a community-tracked medical cannabis cultivar distributed in the UK by Glass Pharms. Patients report it is commonly used for various conditions. All reviews on CanVerify are tied to specific batch numbers so you can see how quality varies between harvests.

Community reviews reflect individual patient experiences, not clinical trials. Effects vary by person, batch, and condition. Do not start, stop, or change treatment based on this site alone. Listing data (including prices and availability) may be sourced from public UK catalogs and is refreshed periodically — not live market data. Confirm current pricing and stock with your pharmacy.