Orange Cake product photo
Non-Irradiated

Orange Cake — Lot420™

Orange Cake · UK listing data from MedBud · Batch-tracked by the community

THC 27% · CBD <1%

Photo via medbud.wiki

DistributorDistributor / supplier
Lot420™

Name on UK pharmacy menus and prescription labels.

Grown byCultivator
Not listed

We don't have a confirmed cultivator for this listing yet.

IP / parent: Lot420 Inc.

Batch History & Patch Updates

Community-tracked quality changes across every medicine drop

14 batches tracked
  1. Batch: 2026-04-7

    Review posted April 2026

    Review posted — April 2026

    2 community reviews

    Latest Drop

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/citrus/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  2. Batch: 2023-11-3

    Review posted November 2023

    Review posted — November 2023

    7 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a noticeable citrus aroma. For effects, patients commonly report uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  3. Batch: 2026-04-6

    Review posted April 2026

    Review posted — April 2026

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/citrus/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  4. Batch: 2026-04-5

    Review posted April 2026

    Review posted — April 2026

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/citrus/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  5. Batch: 2026-04-4

    Review posted April 2026

    Review posted — April 2026

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/citrus/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  6. Batch: 2024-05

    Review posted May 2024

    Review posted — May 2024

    3 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include distinct flavour on inhale. Highlights: Quality improvement.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  7. Batch: 2023-11-2

    Review posted November 2023

    Review posted — November 2023

    7 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a noticeable citrus aroma. For effects, patients commonly report uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  8. Batch: 2026-04-3

    Review posted April 2026

    Review posted — April 2026

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/citrus/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  9. Batch: 2023-07

    Review posted July 2023

    Review posted — July 2023

    14 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention potent effects. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/skunk/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain, calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  10. Batch: 2024-12

    Review posted December 2024

    Review posted — December 2024

    6 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 5.5/10

    Review:Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/berry/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. Issues flagged in discussion include Contamination concern.

    Positives

    • Quality improvement
    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Contamination concern

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  11. Batch: 2026-04-2

    Review posted April 2026

    Review posted — April 2026

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/citrus/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  12. Batch: 2023-11

    Review posted November 2023

    Review posted — November 2023

    7 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention dense, resinous flower structure, and smooth smoke/vapor. Sensory notes include a noticeable citrus aroma. For effects, patients commonly report uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  13. Batch: 2024-02

    Review posted February 2024

    Review posted — February 2024

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 10.0/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. Sensory notes include a strong terpene profile on the nose and distinct flavour on inhale. For effects, patients commonly report effective for chronic pain, possible appetite or nausea support, and mentioned for headache/migraine relief.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Effective for symptoms

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  14. Batch: 2026-04

    Review posted April 2026

    Review posted — April 2026

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 8.5/10

    Review: Overall community feedback is positive for this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention good moisture and stickiness, dense, resinous flower structure, smooth smoke/vapor, and harsh smoke or vapor. Sensory notes include a pronounced gas/citrus/sweet aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report calming effects, and uplifting daytime effects.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile
    • Dense nugs
    • Effective for symptoms
    • Smooth smoke/vapor

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?

About this strain

Orange Cake is a community-tracked medical cannabis cultivar distributed in the UK by Lot420™. Patients report it is commonly used for chronic pain, migraine, nausea. All reviews on CanVerify are tied to specific batch numbers so you can see how quality varies between harvests.

Community reviews reflect individual patient experiences, not clinical trials. Effects vary by person, batch, and condition. Do not start, stop, or change treatment based on this site alone.