Permanent Fruz product photo

Permanent Fruz — Green Karat

Permanent Fruz · UK listing data from MedBud · Batch-tracked by the community

THC 20% · CBD <1%

Photo via medbud.wiki

DistributorDistributor / supplier
Green Karat

Name on UK pharmacy menus and prescription labels.

Grown byCultivator
Ventuara

This brand also sources from Local micro-cultivators depending on batch.

Batch History & Patch Updates

Community-tracked quality changes across every medicine drop

20 batches tracked
  1. Batch: 2025-08-16

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  2. Batch: 2025-08-15

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  3. Batch: 2025-08-14

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  4. Batch: 2025-08-13

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  5. Batch: 2025-08-12

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  6. Batch: 2025-08-11

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  7. Batch: 2025-05-4

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a strong terpene profile on the nose. Highlights: Strong terpene profile.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  8. Batch: 2025-08-10

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  9. Batch: 2025-08-9

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  10. Batch: 2025-08-8

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  11. Batch: 2025-08-7

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  12. Batch: 2025-08-6

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  13. Batch: 2025-08-5

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  14. Batch: 2025-08-4

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  15. Batch: 2025-08-3

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  16. Batch: 2025-08-2

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  17. Batch: 2025-05-3

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a strong terpene profile on the nose. Highlights: Strong terpene profile.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  18. Batch: 2025-08

    Review posted August 2025

    Review posted — August 2025

    3 community reviews

    ⚠ Community Warning

    Rating: 3.5/10

    Review:Community members have raised quality concerns about this batch. On physical quality, reviewers mention milder-than-expected potency. Sensory notes include a pronounced pine/floral/pepper aroma and similar character on the palate. For effects, patients commonly report possible appetite or nausea support. Issues flagged in discussion include Micro-seeds reported, Underwhelming quality, and Quality disappointment.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Micro-seeds reported
    • Underwhelming quality
    • Quality disappointment

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  19. Batch: 2025-05-2

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a strong terpene profile on the nose. Issues flagged in discussion include Community avoid alert.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Community avoid alert

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?
  20. Batch: 2025-05

    Review posted May 2025

    Review posted — May 2025

    2 community reviews

    Archived Batch

    Rating: 7.0/10

    Review: Community feedback is mixed — some positives, but not universally praised. Sensory notes include a strong terpene profile on the nose. Issues flagged in discussion include Community avoid alert.

    Positives

    • Strong terpene profile

    Issues

    • Community avoid alert

    Summarised from community discussion — not a direct quote.

    Was this summary helpful?

About this strain

Permanent Fruz is a community-tracked medical cannabis cultivar distributed in the UK by Green Karat (grown by Ventuara). Patients report it is commonly used for various conditions. All reviews on CanVerify are tied to specific batch numbers so you can see how quality varies between harvests.

Community reviews reflect individual patient experiences, not clinical trials. Effects vary by person, batch, and condition. Do not start, stop, or change treatment based on this site alone.